Agree we don’t know all the details but would think it might have been feasible to use the existing four corner positions. Tha lamps could be positioned to cover their quarter of the pitch.
By removing the mid pitch pylons you allow additional space for future development.
Perhaps we might get further information soon?
New pitch?
It's a bit bizarre isn't it.
Like the recent crash barriers added along the main terracing, there are no gaps to walk between them, for really long periods.
Also nuts and bolts holding them together.
I've never seen this style at any other ground, they are always welded together, and you have short sections with breaks to walk between.
Very weird, anyone else notice it?
Like the recent crash barriers added along the main terracing, there are no gaps to walk between them, for really long periods.
Also nuts and bolts holding them together.
I've never seen this style at any other ground, they are always welded together, and you have short sections with breaks to walk between.
Very weird, anyone else notice it?
-
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2021 3:09 pm
Yes, the layout struck me as being a bit odd to say.the leasr. I just assumed it was a Richmond Council health and safety requirement or something.Jamie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 12:34 pm It's a bit bizarre isn't it.
Like the recent crash barriers added along the main terracing, there are no gaps to walk between them, for really long periods.
Also nuts and bolts holding them together.
I've never seen this style at any other ground, they are always welded together, and you have short sections with breaks to walk between.
Very weird, anyone else notice it?
-
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:18 pm
There might be some floodlights and other equipment going cheap at Staines!
Lord Elpus wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 2:42 pmYes, the layout struck me as being a bit odd to say.the leasr. I just assumed it was a Richmond Council health and safety requirement or something.Jamie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 12:34 pm It's a bit bizarre isn't it.
Like the recent crash barriers added along the main terracing, there are no gaps to walk between them, for really long periods.
Also nuts and bolts holding them together.
I've never seen this style at any other ground, they are always welded together, and you have short sections with breaks to walk between.
Very weird, anyone else notice it?
Well as I've never seen it before or since, was it done by a contractor who doesn't usually do sports stadia? It's very odd.
An update on this. The issue of moving floodlights to the four corners is one of increased height needed for pylons so that the pitch is fully covered and the increase in light pollution which occur as a result. This might impact on the ability to get planning. The club spoke to a number of specialists and all advised to go with the existing eight pylon strategy. Hope this tidies up the matter.
Thanks for asking the questions and feeding back Tony.Tony wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 12:52 pmAn update on this. The issue of moving floodlights to the four corners is one of increased height needed for pylons so that the pitch is fully covered and the increase in light pollution which occur as a result. This might impact on the ability to get planning. The club spoke to a number of specialists and all advised to go with the existing eight pylon strategy. Hope this tidies up the matter.
On modern sports lighting, light pollution is much improved as use LEDs and other forms rather than traditional bulbs, so wouldn't it be better to look much further into this.
As others have said, by not having the two additional pylons down the side of the pitch, would surely allow for ease of further developments in the future, like a new main stand etc.
It seems every upgrade done at the ground in the last 20 years seems to be what is easiest now, rather than thinking of future and ongoing plans.